Review relation between “Is” and “Ought” in the view of Allameh Tabatabai

Abstract

Ethics reviews conceptive and statement basic of morality. Ethics include four part: moral analytic, moral epistemology, moral ontology and logical discussion. One of the issues in Ethics is logical discussion that reviews deduction of moral conception and statement and moral false reasoning, therefor logical discussion reviews relation between “Is” and “Ought To” in the view of Allameh Tabatabai that hasn’t been critic up to now like this way. The author tries to critics the view of Allameh Tabatabai in this problem in all aspect. Allameh Tabatabai argues that moral statements are reductive, predicative and also logically. He calls it debate. But it is possible to certainty and we are capable to answer problems to certainty. In any way he believes debate for moral statement and it is based on reality. However Allameh Tabatabai don’t accept moral relativism and he reductive relation between “Is” and “Ought To” to “is” and “is”.