Refutation of Hume's theory about miracles from the point of view of philosophy and history

Abstract

Some scientists, including David Hume, have tried to consider the news of miracles as unreliable. According to Hume's belief, there is no miracle that sufficient and qualified people have confirmed, human nature has an extremely strong desire for strange things, supernatural and miraculous news mainly and abundantly among nations. They are seen as ignorant and savage, due to the conflict of different religions, the miracles that are claimed to prove the truth of each of them weaken and invalidate each other; In this article, relying on the descriptive-library method, it will be clear that Hume's opinion is not acceptable. Memories and archives of the past, testimony of eyewitnesses and historical reports and quotations, physical works left behind, and some scientific laws, and most importantly, the frequency of supernatural news and the citation and acceptance of these news are among the most important reasons for rejecting Hume's theory